Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrug, John F.
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-09T14:38:18Z
dc.date.available2015-06-09T14:38:18Z
dc.date.issued1976
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/926
dc.descriptionPresented to the Ohio Pastoral Conference at Beautiful Savior, Grove City, Ohio, 1976.en_US
dc.description.abstractJohn F. Brug’s essay examines the terminology and theological principles surrounding church discipline, particularly in cases of impenitence. He surveys biblical, historical, and Lutheran perspectives on terms such as excommunication, suspension, removal, and self-exclusion. Brug argues that Scripture does not distinguish between categories of discipline based on the type of sin—whether moral or doctrinal—but emphasizes impenitence as the basis for exclusion from fellowship. He critiques the use of certain terms, such as “self-excommunication” and “suspension,” for their ambiguity or misleading connotations, and recommends clearer alternatives like “removed from fellowship” or “removed at own request.” Brug stresses that discipline must be carried out with clarity, love, and a goal of restoration, and that terminology should reflect the spiritual seriousness of the action. He concludes that while uniform terminology is helpful, Christian liberty allows for variation as long as biblical principles are upheld. Abstract prepared by Microsoft Copilot (GPT-4).
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectChurch Disciplineen_US
dc.subjectExcommunicationen_US
dc.subjectFellowshipen_US
dc.titleThe Terminology of Church Discipline Excommunication, Suspension, Removal, Etc.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record