A Comparative Study of 2 Thessalonians 3:14-15 and Titus 3:10 with Practical Emphasis of the Implication upon Present Intersynodical Controversy

Abstract

George W. Boldt presents a comparative exegesis of 2 Thessalonians 3:14–15 and Titus 3:10, focusing on church discipline and doctrinal purity. He contrasts the treatment of disorderly Christians with that of heretics, emphasizing the need for admonition and eventual separation when repentance is refused. Boldt applies these principles to the historical controversy between the Wisconsin and Missouri Synods, arguing that the Wisconsin Synod delayed appropriate action in response to Missouri’s doctrinal deviations, particularly regarding Scouting, the Chaplaincy, and the Common Confession. He contends that continued fellowship with Missouri, despite clear warnings and lack of repentance, implicates Wisconsin in Missouri’s errors. Boldt calls for a firm rejection of heresy in accordance with Scripture, urging the Wisconsin Synod to sever ties and clearly identify false doctrine and heretical teaching. His essay is a passionate plea for doctrinal integrity and faithful obedience to God’s Word. Abstract generated with the assistance of Microsoft Copilot (GPT-4).