Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKipfmiller, David A.
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-25T02:12:56Z
dc.date.available2015-06-25T02:12:56Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2518
dc.descriptionPresented to the Southeast Michigan Pastoral Conference at Grass Lake, Michigan on April 10, 2002.en_US
dc.description.abstractPastor David Kipfmiller, in his essay for the 2002 Southeast Michigan Pastoral Conference, gives a detailed overview of the Majoristic controversy leading up to the writing of the Formula of Concord (especially article IV “Of Good Works”). He places the controversy in its historical setting by examining the Augsburg and Leipzig interims. He presents the major characters—such as George Major and Nikolaus von Amsdorf—and he carefully explains both the errors of saying, “Good works are necessary for salvation,” and “Good works are injurious to salvation.” Overall, the essay is a well-balanced treatment of all the major issues in the Majoristic controversy.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectFormula of Concorden_US
dc.subjectGood Worksen_US
dc.subjectMajoristic Controversyen_US
dc.titleThe Majoristic Controversy (1551-1562): As Addressed by Article IV of the Formula of Concord (Of Good Works)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record